Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 19

< April 18	April 20 >

April 19

File:Dera Ghazi Khan Skyline.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Alishernavoi with the reason "poor resolution/appears to be a screen grab from a video. User also has uploaded images from facebook as his own: File:Karachi downtown 2.jpg" FASTILY 01:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karachi City Skyline.jpg - Stolen from Twitter: here Alishernavoi (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karachi downtown 2.jpg - This image was stolen from Facebook: here Alishernavoi (talk) 01:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karachi Skyline.jpg - Stolen from forum at skyscraper city forum. [skyscrapercity.com/attachments/d3f87974-9256-41b4-9737-f10c9578325d-21015-0000af20a8737987-jpg.40603/] Sorry, I can't link to skyscrapercity directly because I get a notice that its a blacklisted site. Alishernavoi (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karachi Urban Skyline.jpg - Stolen from skyscrapercity forum. I can't link to it because its a blacklisted site.

File:Mosque in Rahim Yar Khan.jpg - This image was a screen grab and has a watermark on the bottom rightAlishernavoi (talk) 01:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karachi city 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stolen from facebook: https://scontent.fkhi9-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/91252903_3087002947987137_8832520276227915776_o.jpg?_nc_cat=106&_nc_sid=110474&_nc_ohc=JvOF9k_J54wAX8yvc9Y&_nc_ht=scontent.fkhi9-1.fna&oh=85ff711eba46a731ed315413a3a22ff3&oe=5EA7C22B — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alishernavoi (talk • contribs) 02:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 09:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RanaChensinensis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This file comes from a National Science Foundation website, but it appears to have been used with permission, not created by a NSF employee. At the source page, it's suggested that images not specifically credited to the NSF are for non-commercial use only. Wikiacc (¶) 02:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ This appears to be the author, a then graduate student at University of Washington, now researcher in Iceland. While the project she was on was funded in part by a US government agency, she was not a US government employee, so the license does not apply. However, we may wish to reach out to her and see if she'd release it under a free license herself. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I've sent an email to Ms. Woods requesting that she release the image under a free license. Let's see if she responds. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Keep There is an OTRS ticket (Ticket:2020042010004485) from the author that puts this under CC-BY-SA 4.0. I can't process it because I was the one that reached out to Ms. Woods, but imagine it'll get processed in the next few days. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Now File:Rana Chensinensis, Southern Sakhalin Island, Russia.jpg on Commons. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as F8. And a round of applause, please, for The Squirrel Conspiracy, for tracking down Dr. Woods and getting the permission so quickly. Wikiacc (¶) 19:55, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skelegirls at Varsity Cheerleading Event.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While the focus of this photo is clearly a US Government work, the photo itself appears to be self-made. As a result, it's unclear what license it's supposed to be under. Wikiacc (¶) 02:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is incorrectly licensed, and the absence of any author information means it's impossible to determine the correct license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rich Vernon, Seattle 2018.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from Heather Viereck of Against the Grain Photography is required. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How would you like me to obtain that? I mean, to your satisfaction, since I already have permission. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The process for Heather Viereck to follow is at WP:DONATEIMAGE. Claiming that you are the copyrigh tholder when you aren't is not acceptable. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was what was suggested to me, which is why I did it. I don't understand any of this, which is why I only ever upload my own photos. Just delete the pair of them immediately and I'll tell the artist to tell her she'll have to upload it herself. Although how you will be able to prove it's her uploading it is anyone's guess. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STAPinGEF3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Estopedist1 with the reason "practically identical already in Commons: File:STAPinGEF2012.png" FASTILY 22:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete I've moved it to Commons, so this now qualifies for speedy deletion via CSD F8. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.